Homosexual Marriage Love

Homo cozy Marriage LoveWhat be the rules of coupling? Who accepts these rules and what argon they based on? Is man and wife for everyvirtuoso? These be just a few questions that boggle lots minds when it comes to the matter of kindred c in solely down espousal. In the respectable issue of akin wind up matrimony, the union of deuce people who in truth delight each other should be con billetred over moral reasons against a uniform(p) sex marriage. umteen people feel that alike(p) sex marriage should be illegal because they feel that paederastic couples ar unable to make the equivalent contri providedions to familiarity that heterosexual marriages argon able to make, but this is non so. Homosexual marriages do non affect society in a negative way and should be legal and recognized just as heterosexual marriages are.Several constituents are considered when trying to determine the legality of aforesaid(prenominal) sex marriages. unriv aloneed factor is the ec onomic advantage because of the benefits given by the presidential term to get hitched with couples. A nonher is the issue of children and whether homosexuals seat contribute to society by care for their offspring. The biggest concern is the moral effect that homosexuality has on the society. Although people feel that uniform sex marriages will littleen the standards of society, should the government activity be allowed to supplant marriage because the vast majority of the population is daunted by it? Same sex marriage should be legal.In the 1990s, gays and lesbians assay to establish themselves in main stream Ameri can life (Perkel, Marc). umteen an(prenominal) people were coming out, and society had to find ways to deal with this parvenu outward demonstration of homosexuality. During this time, homosexuality became much common on television, in movies and other realms of media. This caused an uprise amongst conservatives who were against homosexuality. Soon after t his new outward video display of homosexuality became more prevalent, homosexuals non solo wanted to be socially accepted , they wanted the in effect(p) to get marry (Same Sex).Society and the government energise gone back and forth on this issue and many another(prenominal) decisions keep up been made and subsequently turned over. Neither the constitution nor federal statutes offer clear-cut protection for Americans from the prevalent discrimi dry land based on sexual orientations. States were responsible for both fairnesss concerning similar sex orientation and same sex marriages. The laws on homosexuality vary from state to state. Vermont is currently the only state to have legalized same sex marriage. Heterosexual couples eligible to draw can have their marriage per castinged in any state and have it recognized in every other sate in the nation and every country in the world. Couples who are joined in a civil union in Vermont have no guarantee that their marriage pro tections will even travel with them to neighboring states such(prenominal) as brand-new York or innovative Hampshire. This is not right and should not be acceptable. If we vanity ourselves on being a country appointed on the equality of all, how can we deny our own citizens this right on the basis of sexual pick?During Former President Clintons tenure, he signed the Defense of Marriage piece on September 21, st 1996. This denied federal recognition of same sex marriages. Many people feel that same sex unions, which are practically the same as marriage, minus some small benefits, would be more bewitch for homosexual couples. alternatively, some recommend domestic help partnerships. Under a domestic partnership, homosexual partners have all the same rights as married couples however, they are not married and are not socially considered married. Today the caper lies with homosexuals feeling that same sex unions and domestic partnerships are not plentiful and that marriage sho uld be a right allowed to all citizens regardless of sexual orientation. Comparing marriage to civil unions is like comparing diamonds to cubic zirconium. One is quite simply the real thing, the other is not.On the contrary, conservatives say that homosexual marriage is an oxymoron and should not be legal. Robert Knight, the author of Same Sex Marriages Should non Be Legal, claims that marriage is the union between a man and a woman, the most important social intromission around the world. Legalizing same sex marriage would turn the state against those who believe in the traditional rendering of marriage. Many people in America check over with Robert Knight however, the sum of people who are for same sex marriage is steadily increasing. more(prenominal) and more people are realizing that the legality of same sex marriage does not turn the state against heterosexual couples, but rather allows cardinal people who live each other the right to be married regardless their of sexu al orientation.The love one soul has for another should not and cannot be confined to sexual orientation. Because people do not agree with the marriage between cardinal people, does not mean that marriage should not take place. What is marriage? Most would say the legal union of a man and a woman. Conservatives say that homosexuals fail to meet the requirements of marriage. They say that same sex marriages lessen family values and that having gay parents will make their children more inclined to be gay. These individuals say that homosexuals cannot contribute to society in the form of procreation. Finally, conservatives feel that homosexuals are sinful from a unearthly stand point. temporary hookup these arguments are all very compelling and down the stairsstandable, they are merely opinions and the law should never be based on opinions, but rather on facts, justice, and equality.Concerning family values, who has the right to set the rules for the way a family should be? on th e whole families are different and changes should not be shunned but rather embraced (Whats Wrong). A homosexual marriage does not affect other people of society. Take two men for example. Society has to see the couple together out side of their home. What difference would society see if that same couple were married? The coiffure in none, homosexual marriage does not affect society in a negative way. Society is affected the same way by a heterosexual couple. Children who are raised by two attractive parents will grow up to become their own people because of all the support and nourishment they have been given. It does not matter if those two amiable parents are a mother and a father or two mothers or two fathers (Perkel, Marc).Physically homosexuals cannot procreate, but that does not mean that they can not contribute to society through raising children. There are millions of children who want to be in a home with people who love them. Foster children are often sent from enterta in home to foster home, which leads to a very unstable childhood. Presently, between 1million and 9 million children are being raised by gay, lesbian and bisexual parents in the fall in States (Roleff).Conservatives say that homosexuals will not be able to provide a stable house for children, but a home with two caring parents is far more stable than a foster home where a child rarely receives attention. Studies show that unmarried people seeking to survey a child are over 20 percent less likely than a married couple to be given a child (Whats wrong). Same sex marriages provide a foundation for same sex couples care for children, thus benefiting society in the form of sustenance off spring into the next generation. If homosexuals should not be allowed to get married based on their inability to procreate, then heterosexual couples who are infertile, who necessitate not to have children or are elderly should also not be considered married (Henry).Many people feel that from a spir itual stand point, same sex marriage is wrong. In fact, Christianity, Judaism and Islam, three major religions, do not condone homosexuality or same sex marriage. However, all three of these religions believe in loving thy neighbor. Bishops Joseph Charron, of the Roman Catholic Church says that No same sex union can garner the unique and full potential which the marital relationship expresses (Ford). As Christians, beau ideal teaches us to love everyone and not to punish sinners but to try to have them converted. The Roman Catholic Church does not believe that homosexuals fulfill Gods requirements for marriage. On the contrary, they do believe that they should be treated with compassion. Its true that most religions do not accept homosexuality as being morally right under Gods eyes. However, society cannot play the role of God. The government cannot decide what constitutes love and whether or not the love between two people is just. That is not societys place and the government sh ould not make laws based on our religious views and beliefs. Our Constitution requires the separation of church and state, and this must be carried out.The economic factor that comes with marriage is also something that homosexual couples want. Married couples are entitled to things like shared tax returns, special tax exemptions, deductions and refunds, coverage for the uninsured under the spouses medical care, disability and life insurance plans, survivor benefits, social security measure and pension plans, inheritance free from taxation, next of kin status in the case of an emergency and mental incapacity or death. These are all the things that married couples have and all the things that homosexual couples cannot attain. Should a psyche be denied these benefits for the rest of their life because they are in love with a person of the same sex and cannot be married?As a society, people need to be more accepting and less afraid of change. If it were not for change and accepting t he unfamiliar, like different races, religions and preferences, America would not be the melting pot it is today. In America, the Constitution declares that all people should be treated equal. Same sex couples live in 99.3 % of all the counties nationwide. When we prohibit homosexuals from marrying, society is treating them as if they are unequal to heterosexuals. Sexual orientation should not be a reason to compromise the principals on which the Constitution is founded. Societys opinions on what is morally right or wrong should not sway the force of what is ethically right. The Constitution does not directly talk about same sex marriage however, many of the rules in it are directly associate to why same sex marriage should be legal. Among them are life, improperness and the pursuit of happiness all men are created equal lastly, all men should have a chance for justice under the law.All of these things are taken away from people just because of their sexual preference, and becaus e their lifestyle is not the average American lifestyle. It is important to not allow what one feels to be right and wrong affect anothers right to happiness. Remember that marriage is not a creation of law, law relating to marriage merely recognizes and regulates an institution that already exists (Whats Wrong). When the government denies homosexuals the right to marry, it treats them like second class citizens. only as society treated interracial couples not to long ago. wherefore should people be punished because they do not have the same sexual orientation and preference as the rest of society? why should people be denied benefits because they will not give in to gimmicks such as same sex unions and domestic partnerships? Society needs to change. How many couples will have to suffer before America realizes that the government is not protecting society by banning same sex marriage, but rather hurting it? Not every boy wants to date a girl, and not every girl wants to marry a b oy. Just because their feelings are different does not mean they are not sincere. Homosexuals have the same thoughts and the same feelings that heterosexuals have, it is just that those feelings are for the same sex. The government cannot make homosexuality go away, and as long as at that place is homosexuality there will be a desire for same sex marriage. As men and women, it is natural to want to find that significant other, and once youve found them you want to engage in that sacred union of marriage with that person and reap all the benefits that it entails. Love is not bias to race, creed or sexual orientation. Legal or not, there will and always should be same sex marriages.Works Cited Bidstrup, Scott. sprightly Marriage The Arguments and the Motives. bidstrup. 2004. 7 Apr. 2007.Ford, doubting Thomas Michael. Out Spoken Role Models from the Lesbian and homophile(a) Community New York Beech Tree, 1998.Gator Gay Straight Alliance. 12 Reasons. Gator Gay Straight Alliance . 18 Feb. 2004. TheUniversity of Floridas Gay Straight Alliance. 8 Apr. 2007 .Henry, Charles. cry interview. 6 Apr. 2007.Perkel, Marc. Same Sex Marriage. The Peoples Legal Front. 16 Apr. 2007 http//www.perkel.com/politics/issues/samesex.htmRoleff, Tamara L., Ed. Gay Rights. San Diego, CA Greenhaven press, Inc., 1997.Same Sex Marriage ban awaits vote in Senate Indy Star.com Apr. 8. 2007. The online Edition of the Indianapolis Star. 16 Feb. 2005 The Family Research Council Defending Family, Faith and Freedom. 8 Apr. 2007 Whats Wrong with letting Same Sex Couples Marry? FRC.org 8 Apr. 2007.