Crime and Punishment Essay

The meaning of Notes from electrical resistance to the artistic human being is difficult to overestimate. As menti one(a)d by L. P. Grosman Notes from thermionic vacuum tube is one of the closely exposing compositions of Dostoyevsky. Never has it happened again that he opens up in much(prenominal) fullness all of his most intimate thoughts, not meant for show secrets of his affectionateness (Grosman, 299). Becoming the prelude to other great run aways of Dostoyevsky, Notes from vacuum tube influenced worldly concern literature, not only Russian literary growth.Merezhkovskii thought that the main variety between Dostoyevskys and Nietzsches last freedoms is that Dostoyevsky, growing belowground ideas in his characters, but not completing them still tried to grasp onto Russian orthodoxy, while the other praised the man Just as Nietzsche Dostoyevsky considers the last adorn of freedom to be the man-god, the antichrist, with the difference in the two being that Nietzsche bl esses this gift, and Dostoyevsky curses it (Merezhkovskii, 217 218).By the thoughts of Berdyaev, if before Notes from tube-shaped structure Dostoyevsky was no more than a humanist, full of gentleness for the poor people, the humiliated and insulted, the characters of the House of the Dead, then from Notes from Underground begins the brilliant ideological dialectic of Dostoyevsky. He is no longer maxly a psychologist, he is a metaphysician he explores, to the depths, the tragedies of human spirit. He is no longer a humanist by the old meaning of the ledger He has completely torn away from Belinskys humanism. (Berdyaev, 36).At the alike time Berdyaev did not share this opinion with Shestov rough Dostoyevsky being an exclusive underground psychologist Dostoyevsky possesses underground psychology only in the moment of the ghostly journey of man. He does not leave us in the unhopeful circle of underground psychology, he removes us from it (Berdyaev, 141). Losing humanistic fait h in man, Dostoyevsky has no choice but to be loyal to the Christian principles, deepening, alter and enriching them therefore, he cannot be a gloom, hopelessly-pessimistic writer.In his darkest and most painful moments Dostoyevsky has the brightness of Christ the freeing light (37). Notes from Underground was praised as one of the most reaction producing stories by Yermylov, where-in was conducted not only malicious controversy with the myth of a genius Russian revolutionary-democrat NG Chernyshevsky, but also told some moral crimes. Thus in the face of the conscience of mankind Dostoyevskys role in moral crime proved heavy because you cannot jaw about the crime with malice (Yermylov, 42 43).Exploring the works of the 1860s, in incident the novel Notes from Underground, Kirpotin concluded about the importance of its poetics for all pursual works of Dostoyevsky and specific to his novel form The poetics of Notes from Underground contains within it vestigial poetics from t he later works of Dostoyevsky. The merging of philosophy and narration in Notes from Underground, and its dissolution in the story soon after led to the mental hospital of the first great novel by Dostoyevsky Crime and Punishment, a new novel which was specific to Dostoyevskys type.(Kirpotin, 472, 475) The genius of Dostoyevsky in Notes from Underground is expressed in that he felt, and strongly expressed the psychology of philosophical experience. Demonstrating how ones character forms or deforms under heavy influence, he was able to show the crystallization of the human spirit this concept has gained world renowned meaning. Separating Dostoyevsky from his character and considering Notes from Underground as a complete work of art and nothing less, Kirpotin admitted the truth expressed in the story about the authors vision, retaining its aesthetic nature.However, through aesthetics Dostoyevsky peered into anthology, into the philosophy of the world, into set and alliance, but stated Kirpotin as he understood them, of range (Kirpotin, 175). Understanding the writer, according to Kirpotin was inadequate for the ideas of the advanced people in society Dostoyevsky kept to his ingenious artistic discoveries despite his beliefs.Prospective studies carried out under the archetypal approach in the study of the underground image cooperate find the answers to a number of important questions about this work on the true place of the man from the underground in Dostoyevskys work, on the expressive or un-expressive characteristics in all its characters and on the means of poetic incarnation of the underground phenomenon, on the influence of the image of an underground torpedo on the classic works of world literature, which spawned a whole impulsion of underground characters.