High Reliability Organizations Essay -- Safety, Security, Hazard

In upstart years, m any(prenominal) organizations particularly in a high assay constancy have experienced signifi fundamentt losses. For this reason, they have been more considered the importance of the apprehension High Reliability Organization (HROs). Weick and Sutcliffe (2001) as cited in Takagi and Nakanishi (2006), claim that a comprehending of the HRO ideal can lead to clearly understand a technical system within an organization. This leads to minimize any failures from unexpected circumstances. To be more precise, it can be said that the HRO principle assists the organization to determine the risk factors that may negatively affect a company performance in an early submit of a project life cycle. Similarly, Laporte and Consolini (1991) as cited in Aase and Tjensvoll (n.d.) state that any high risk organizations who has applied the HROs principles tend to have an outstanding guard duty records. This essay will first provide a general overview of HROs concept and t hen identify five characteristics of mindfulness which are consistently accepted as the aspect of HROs. In the second section, it will introduce the Normal misfortune Theory (NAT) by Charles Perrow. Finally, it will highlight the recommendations in improving the current catch practice to be more effective.Perrow (1986) as cited in Aase and Tjensvoll (n.d.) notes that one of the or so important characteristics of HRO is to avoid hazardous operational breakdown. In addition, the impact of much(prenominal) failures can be considered as catastrophe resulting in at that place are complex interactions, passing interdependent technologies and tight coupling within an internal system. Moreover, Weick and Consolini (n.d.) as cited in Haudt, et.al., (n.d.) state that there are five characterist... ...ial approaches which are Normal Accident and HROs, although it seems certain that twain of them tends to limit the progression that can contribute toward achieving to highly prote ctive systems. This is because the orbit of the problems is too narrow and the potential of the solutions is too limited as well. Hence, Laporte and Consolini et.al., (1991) as cited in Marais, et.al., (2004) conclude that the most interesting feature of the high dependableness organization is to prioritize both performance and security by the managerial oversight. In addition, the goal agreement must be an official announcement. In essence, it is recommended that there is a continuing need in the high risk organizations for more awareness of developing security system and high reliability environment in order to gain highly successful method to lower risk in an advance technology system.